The Lord of the Rings: Books vs. Peter Jackson's Films
A full-spoiler tour of what Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings films cut, changed, added and kept from Tolkien's book.
Heads up: this post contains full spoilers. If you're not caught up yet, it'll still be here when you are.
Spoiler warning: this guide compares the books and films in detail, including how the story ends. It's written for readers and viewers who have finished both, or who don't mind knowing everything in advance.
Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings films were a worldwide critical and box-office success, in Britannica's words. They also give book fans endless material for friendly arguments. Here's a tour of the biggest differences: what was cut, what was changed, what was added, and why the films still feel so close to Tolkien.
The films at a glance
Britannica lists the three films as The Fellowship of the Ring (2001), The Two Towers (2002) and The Return of the King (2003). They were hits with both critics and audiences. The Return of the King won 11 Academy Awards, including best picture and best director, which tied the record for most Oscars won by a single film, shared with Ben-Hur (1959) and Titanic (1997).
One reason the films look so much like the books in readers' heads: Jackson hired John Howe and Alan Lee, two of the best-known Tolkien illustrators, to work on the design, as Den of Geek's Juliette Harrisson points out in her look at how faithful the movies are.
It's also worth remembering that the book was never really a trilogy. Britannica notes it was split into three volumes because of its bulk and to lower the publisher's risk, and the Tolkien Estate's site likewise calls the trilogy label a mistake. The films kept the three-part shape, but they moved scenes across the volume lines.
What the films left out
- Tom Bombadil. In the book, the hobbits' early journey includes the Old Forest, the cheerful and mysterious Tom Bombadil, and a frightening stop at the ancient burial mounds. The films skip all of it. Den of Geek argues Tom is so peripheral to the main plot, and so light in tone, that cutting him was a sensible choice.
- Glorfindel. In the book, an Elf named Glorfindel helps Frodo get away from the Black Riders on the road to Rivendell. In the film, Arwen does it. Glorfindel has only a small part in the rest of the book (he speaks at the Council of Elrond), while Arwen is Aragorn's love interest, so the swap gives a major character more to do.
- The Scouring of the Shire. Near the end of the book, the hobbits come home to find that Saruman has taken over the Shire and industrialized it. The films leave this out entirely. Den of Geek notes that a common complaint about The Return of the King was that it already had too many endings, so another big climax after the Ring is destroyed would have been a tough sell. Saruman's alternative death scene ended up only in the Extended Edition.
- Smaller losses. Galadriel's gift to Sam of a box of earth from Lothlórien is gone. So are many of the book's songs, though some songs and laments return in the Extended Editions.
What the films changed
- The timeline. In the book, a long time passes between Bilbo's farewell party and Gandalf telling Frodo the truth about the Ring: 17 years, per Den of Geek, against what seems like a few weeks in the film. Britannica's summary notes that Frodo inherits the Ring at 33, the age of adulthood among hobbits, so book Frodo is about 50 when he sets out. Den of Geek puts film Frodo at about thirty years younger.
- Faramir. According to Den of Geek, this is the change that upset book fans most. In the book, Faramir learns that Frodo carries the One Ring and still lets the hobbits go, holding to his earlier word: "Not if I found it on the highway would I take it" (The Two Towers, Book IV, Chapter 5). In the film, he gives in to the temptation for a while and takes the hobbits toward his father, as far as Osgiliath. An attack by the Black Riders there pushes Frodo to the edge, and only then does Faramir let them go. Den of Geek calls this the biggest departure in the trilogy, and the only one that changes a key character. It also notes the payoff: the scene shows how hard the Ring is pressing on Frodo, and it gives Sam a memorable speech.
- Shelob. In the book, Frodo and Sam's fight with the giant spider Shelob belongs to The Two Towers. The films move it into The Return of the King, partly, Den of Geek explains, because the hobbits' journey through Mordor in the book's last volume is short on action scenes.
- Sam's door. The very last shot shows Sam walking into a hobbit hole with a yellow door, not the green door of Bag End, which Frodo had left to him. It's a tiny detail, and of course it bothers some fans a lot.
What the films added
- Arwen's story. In the book, Arwen appears briefly at Rivendell and is barely seen again until she arrives near the end of the story to marry Aragorn. The films give her a storyline in which she starts toward the Grey Havens, then turns back after a vision of the son she and Aragorn will have. Den of Geek sees this as a way of dramatizing her choice to marry a mortal, without changing her basic arc.
- Elves at Helm's Deep. In the film, Haldir leads a company of Elves to fight beside the Rohirrim at Helm's Deep, and he is killed in the battle. Den of Geek counts this as a clear departure from the book. Its view is that losing a named character gives the battle more emotional weight. Otherwise the only named casualty there would be Háma, Théoden's doorward.
What the films kept
For all the changes, the films follow the book's action closely. Den of Geek notes that much of the dialogue comes straight from the novels, sometimes modernized a little or moved to another scene. The major story beats are all there, and so are the big themes, especially the importance of pity and mercy, which matter so much at the very end.
How The Hobbit films compare
Jackson went on to adapt The Hobbit as three films: An Unexpected Journey (2012), The Desolation of Smaug (2013) and The Battle of the Five Armies (2014). Here the gap between book and film is much wider. One short children's book became three long epics. That meant a lot of new material, including the Elf Tauriel and her romance with the Dwarf Kíli, which the filmmakers created entirely, as Den of Geek notes. Some additions show things the book only mentions, like Gandalf going off to deal with the Necromancer.
Enjoying both
- Treat them as two tellings of one story. Adaptations have to change things to work on screen, and Den of Geek's verdict is that the films stay generally very faithful to the spirit of the books even when the details shift.
- If you saw the films first, the book will still surprise you. Bombadil, the Scouring of the Shire and Faramir's quiet strength are waiting for you.
- If you read the book first, try the Extended Editions. They add back songs and laments, plus Saruman's final scene.
Sources
Fan site. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the rights holders of the works discussed.